So, you're probably up to speed by now, but here's a quick recap. Like many of you I've been moved to ESA from Incapacity Benefit. They sent me that stupid, irrelevant form; you know the one, "tell us how you manage carrying a large empty box..."
I told them very specifically that I believe I should be put straight into the Work-Related Activity Group. After all, I make records, music videos, it would be wrong to say I can't do anything. Lot's of people on ESA genuinely can't work, it would be an insult to those people for me to include myself in that group.
Nevertheless, I face a lot of challenges with my disabilities. I figured WRAG would be able to help me. Sure enough, a prompt reply to my first form told me I would be in the WRAG. After hearing nothing for months, I called the Jobcentre to find out why I hadn't been asked to attend an interview yet. The people I spoke to were dumbfounded; nobody has ever asked to be seen re WRAG, I was assured.
Some months later, I saw an advisor. She explained that I would not be required to attend a medical, as my form must have explained my condition accurately. I explained that it explained very little, only that I had asked to be put into the WRAG, which (I presume) accounts for the prompt decision. I waited months for this interview, remember. Turns out, this interview's primary purpose was to explain to me that I was not required to attend any further interviews, and my ESA payments will continue. Despite the best intentions of the advisor, no real help towards me working was offered.
So, after all that, this amused me.
This explains exactly how much of my benefit will be cut if I refuse to attend the interviews I haven't been asked to attend. Remember, I've been told I won't be asked to attend any more.
Makes perfect sense.
Of course, it's a generic letter. You may have one. But, especially in my circumstances, it's faintly ridiculous.
Here's as far as I've got on making sense of ESA. Help me out on this one, this is all I've got. Based on my experiences so far, I'm thinking that:
A - All of us will be treated with the presumption that, while being fit enough to work, we will do everything we can to avoid this scenario, and will lie and cheat if necessary to avoid working. That's why we need to be warned of the dire consequences in stern letters like the one above.
(but)
B - If, like me, you consider yourself capable of working with the right support, you'll get nothing. There is no support, the process serves only to weed out these imaginary work-dodging disabled people the government keeps telling us about. It's a purely defensive strategy, with no genuine motive to help people. Genuine support is not built into the process, because none of us want to get help anyway, RIGHT?
Too cynical? Your mileage may vary, but I can't see it any other way right now.